Has radiometric dating ever been wrong who is madonna dating july 2016

Posted by / 01-Feb-2020 17:24

Has radiometric dating ever been wrong

How do we know that there wasn’t lead in the rock when it was first formed?What is the real initial percentages of the U parent and Pb (lead) daughter elements?This is a real and common problem with radiometric dating techniques.Consider also: ALL of the samples taken from volcanic eruptions of known times and dates are carefully collected and sent to the labs. It is the prime reason many scientists have had doubts about radiometric dating all along.A Summary of the Million Dollar RATE Research Project (Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth) Introduction: Rocks and fossils do not come with dates on them.

We do not know for sure if the rate of decay was the same 1000 years ago, let alone 10,000 years ago, or millions of years ago. Has there been contamination into the rock of either extra amounts of parent or daughter elements? 3) The starting point contains only the parent element.

An examination of sedimentary rocks worldwide shows a striking consistency with the unimaginably massive Flood that wiped out whole environments.

It caused massive sedimentary layering and sorting and fossilizing of the creatures buried therein.

This method is used only on metamorphic and igneous rocks – not sedimentary rocks (which are rocks laid down by water – and is where the fossils are primarily found).

The radio-dating calculations are based on a series of Assumptions: 1) The decay rate has not changed.

has radiometric dating ever been wrong-87has radiometric dating ever been wrong-41has radiometric dating ever been wrong-29

Actually the assignment of a certain number of millions of years to a rock formation does not derive from the strata itself.

One thought on “has radiometric dating ever been wrong”