New yorker article on online dating
PICTURE PERFECT People put a huge amount of time into writing the perfect profile, but does all that effort pay off? It offered the minimal information people needed to have an in-person meeting.
No lengthy profile, no back-and-forth chat, just a blurred photo.
A recent study led by the Northwestern psychologist Eli J.
Finkel argues that no mathematical algorithm can predict whether two people will make a good couple.
As Christian Rudder, an Ok Cupid co-founder, tells it, women who were rated very attractive were unlikely to respond to men rated less attractive.
But when they were matched on Crazy Blind Date, they had a good time. Rudder puts it, “people appear to be heavily preselecting online for something that, once they sit down in person, doesn’t seem important to them.”Some of what we learned about effective photos on Ok Cupid was predictable: Women who flirt for the camera or show cleavage are quite successful.
“They be called ‘introducing services.’ They enable you to go out and go and meet the person yourself.”What about those search algorithms?
When researchers analyzed characteristics of couples who’d met on Ok Cupid, they discovered that one-third had matching answers on three surprisingly important questions: “Do you like horror movies?
(Some categories overlapped.)By 2009, half of all straight couples still met through friends or at a bar or restaurant, but 22 percent met online, and all other sources had shrunk.Cacioppo, more than one-third of couples who married in the United States from 2005 to 2012 met online.Online dating generates a spectrum of reactions: exhilaration, fatigue, inspiration, fury. The typical American spends more of her life single than married, which means she’s likely to invest ever more time searching for romance online. Where to write a negative review calling out the restaurant that gave you food poisoning and ruined your vacation. Where to get treatment for the food poisoning you got at that restaurant where you ate on vacation.